HB 1219 -- UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATORY EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES (Elmer)
COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Committee on Workforce Development and
Workplace Safety
This bill changes the laws regarding unlawful discriminatory
employment practices under the Missouri Human Rights Law and
establishes the Whistleblower Protection Act.
UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATORY EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES UNDER THE MISSOURI
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW
The bill:
(1) Defines the term "because of" or "because”, as it relates to
a decision or action, to mean the protected criterion was a
motivating factor unless the decision or action has an adverse
impact on the protected criterion, in which case courts must rely
on judicial interpretation of federal civil rights and employment
discrimination laws;
(2) Revises the term "employer" by specifying that it is a
person engaged in an industry affecting commerce who has six or
more employees for each working day in each of 20 or more
calendar weeks in the current or preceding year and does not
include an individual employed by an employer; certain tax-exempt
private membership clubs, excluding labor organizations; or
corporations and associations owned and operated by religious or
sectarian groups;
(3) Specifies that any party to certain unlawful discriminatory
practice actions may demand a trial by jury;
(4) Specifies that an award of damages may include all future
pecuniary losses, emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, mental
anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, and other nonpecuniary losses,
and punitive damages awarded;
(5) Specifies that the amount of damages awarded for each plaintiff
cannot exceed the amount of the actual back pay plus interest, court
costs, reasonable attorney fees, and other damages of up to $50,000
in the case of an employer with six to 100 employees in each of 20
or more weeks in the current or preceding calendar year; up to
$100,000 for an employer with 101 to 200 employees; up to $200,000
for an employer with 201 to 500 employees; and up to $300,000 for an
employer with more than 500 employees;
(6) Prohibits punitive damages from being awarded against the state
or any of its political subdivisions except for claims for
discriminatory housing practices authorized in Section 213.040,
RSMo; and
(7) Specifies that the provisions regarding damage awards do not
apply to an alleged violation of Section 213.040, RSMo, unlawful
housing practices; Section 213.045, discrimination in commercial
real estate loans; and Section 213.050, discrimination in real
estate sales and rental organizations, but the provisions will apply
to an alleged violation of Section 213.070, other specified unlawful
discriminatory practices, by an employer.
WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT
The Whistleblower Protection Act is established which places in
statute existing common law exceptions to the at-will employment
doctrine making it an unlawful employment practice for an employer
to discharge or retaliate against an individual who is a protected
person. The bill:
(1) Defines the term "because of" or "because”, as it relates to a
decision or action, to mean the protected criterion was a motivating
factor;
(2) Defines “proper authorities” as a governmental or law
enforcement agency or an officer or the employee’s human resources
representative employed by the employer;
(3) Defines “protected person” as a person who has reported to the
proper authorities an unlawful act of the employer or its agent or
serious misconduct of the employer or its agent that violates a
state law or regulation or a rule of a governmental entity; a person
who has refused to carry out a directive issued by the employer or
its agent that if completed would be a violation of the law; or a
person who engages in conduct otherwise protected by statute or
regulation;
(4) Specifies that the provisions of the act will provide the
exclusive remedy for any and all unlawful employment practices
described in the act and voids any common law causes of action to
the contrary;
(5) Specifies that a protected person aggrieved by a violation will
have a private right of action for damages in a circuit court. The
Missouri Human Rights Commission will not have jurisdiction to
review or adjudicate claims brought under these provisions. The
court may grant as relief, as it deems appropriate, any permanent or
temporary injunction, temporary restraining order, or other order
and may award to the plaintiff actual and punitive damages;
(6) Specifies that any party to an action under these provisions
may demand a trial by jury; and
(7) Specifies that the court may award the plaintiff actual and
punitive damages. An award of damages may include all future
pecuniary losses, emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, mental
anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, and other nonpecuniary losses,
and punitive damages awarded. The amount of all damages awarded for
each complainant cannot exceed the amount of the actual back pay
plus interest, other equitable relief, and other damages of up to
$50,000 in the case of an employer with six to 100 employees in each
of 20 or more weeks in the current or preceding calendar year; up to
$100,000 for an employer with 101 to 200 employees; up to $200,000
for an employer with 201 to 500 employees; and up to $300,000 for an
employer with more than 500 employees.
FISCAL NOTE: No impact on state funds in FY 2013, FY 2014, and FY
2015.